Monthly Archives: March 2012

Mad Hatter


<oocumentProperties>
Normal
0
0
<oages>1</oages>
518
2958
24
<oaragraphs>5</oaragraphs>
3632
11.1539
</oocumentProperties>

0
<woNotShowRevisions/>
<woNotPrintRevisions/>
<wisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</wisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
<wisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</wisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>

            When
I decided almost two years ago that I wanted to really take a shot at being a
writer, I knew the reality of what I was getting into.  Or I thought I knew.  Sure, I dreamed of hitting the Harry
Potter
or Hunger Games lottery and being able to walk away from my teaching
job without any fear of literally becoming a starving artist, but I knew that
was unlikely.  I figured that like
the majority of writers, I’d have to keep my day job and squeeze in writing on
nights, weekends, and school vacations. 
Two jobs, no problem.

            Two
years wiser (and not a penny richer, unfortunately) I am wishing I had been
closer to the mark.  In addition to
trying to be a writer and teacher, I’m now also attempting to be a blogger,
contract negotiator, publicist, website administrator, press-release writer,
and social networker extraordinaire. 
Attempting being the key word. 

            It
seems the days of writing a book, finding a publisher, and sitting back
watching it sell are over–if they ever existed at all.  Now even writers at the bigger
publishing companies need to wear many hats to be successful.  Those of us at the smaller ones
practically need to clone ourselves or learn to live without sleep.  I have friends with babies now, so I’m
trying to take lessons from them, but most are too incoherent to be
helpful.  Not a good sign.

            On
my pessimistic days, the expression “Jack of all trades” dances
through my swarming brain.  It
doesn’t make sense that in order to be a writer, I’m spending less time on my
writing and more time on other jobs. 
On my optimistic days, though, I look for the benefits of these added
duties.  Blogging has forced me to
write in a completely different manner than my fiction writing.  Though I haven’t attempted one yet, I
know writing a press release will also stretch my writing; I haven’t written a
news-style piece since high school journalism.  However, in my opinion, the more genres a writer works in
the better.  Variety creates
growth, which is a good thing.  On
the technology side, maintaining a website and expanding my social media
knowledge keeps me up to date, allows me to connect with my potential audience,
and helps me to interpret what the hell my students mean when they start
talking in tweets.  I’m not open to
accepting essays in 140 characters or less quite yet, but we’ll see.  They would be quicker to correct.  Finally, having to deal with the
business end of things, as well as having to promote my work and myself, has
certainly pushed me out of my comfort zone, which I also view as a positive
experience.  I’m not saying I
appreciated the panic attacks or love the constant blushing whenever I have to
pitch my book to someone new, but I’m looking forward to the day when I have
enough experience that these side-effects subside.  

            There
aren’t too many people who don’t have to do some serious multi-tasking these
days.  Back to those moms and dads
I mentioned earlier, they are the kings and queens of this, and I am in awe.  They can juggle parenting, jobs,
hobbies and everything else life throws at them with sleep in their eyes and
spit-up on their shirt, and at the end of most days are happy they had the
opportunity.  This is the same
skill and outlook writers need. 
The more things I experience, the more accurately I can write about
life.  The more I have to work to
be a writer, the more I’ll appreciate the time I get with my own
“babies”–my books.  So
I’m going to embrace my new tasks, and I’m taking copious notes in case my next
book is about a person with a multiple-personality disorder.  Tea, anyone?

7 Comments

Filed under Writing

Is Kick-ass Compatible With Kleenex?


<oocumentProperties>
Normal
0
0
<oages>1</oages>
588
3352
27
<oaragraphs>6</oaragraphs>
4116
11.1539
</oocumentProperties>

0
<woNotShowRevisions/>
<woNotPrintRevisions/>
<wisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</wisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
<wisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</wisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>

            Go
on nearly any website related to reading and you will find entire discussion
groups dedicated to books with strong heroines. It seems kick-ass female
characters are popular in commercial fiction right now, and not just in books
for young women, but in books for a variety of audiences.  As an independent female and moderate
feminist, this trend is pleasing–to a point.             

I
love reading about and writing about female characters who are self-sufficient,
confident, and who every now and then kick a little ass.  But I also love when those same
characters admit (at least to themselves) to being afraid, insecure, and
sensitive, because, as a woman who also struggles occasionally with these
emotions, it makes these characters easier to relate to.  Real women, strong women, still have feminine qualities that
don’t make them any less kick-ass, yet it seems readers and viewers of
fictional females are quick to criticize a character who displays too much
emotion.  I understand wanting our
heroes and heroines to be a little bit stronger than the people we interact
with in real-life, but a woman doesn’t have to suppress all emotion to be
strong.  For that matter, despite
what society might say to our young boys and men, guys don’t have to either.

            A
few years ago I was writing a paper about the females in the Harry Potter series, and was discouraged to see so many critics,
often females themselves, arguing that J. K. Rowling was exacerbating female
stereotypes in her books.  Their
reasoning often focused on the fact Hermione cried and displayed emotion too
often and Molly Weasley coddled her children and was a stay-at-home mother, as
if a teenage girl who didn’t hide her feelings and a mother who cared deeply
for her family couldn’t also be strong female role-models.  Hermione’s emotions didn’t get in the
way of her using her logic to save her two male co-characters any more than Molly’s love of her
family kept her from fighting evil (while also providing the best line in the
entire seven book series, just before killing another female character: “Not my daughter, you bitch!”).  These female characters’ compassion,
morality, and sensitivity occasionally made them vulnerable, but not weak.

            Shortly
after writing my paper defending the females in Rowling’s works, I began
writing my own novel.  I wanted my
protagonist to be a strong independent female, but as my story progressed, I
realized she cried or wanted to cry almost as often as she verbally or
physically kicked ass.  On one of
my earlier drafts I scratched the question, “Does Alex cry too much?”
in a corner of a page.  I worried
readers might view her as weak.  I
was tempted to edit out a majority of her emotions in order to keep her the
kick-ass heroine I had set out to write. 
It wasn’t until I took a step back and looked at the piece as a whole,
rather than hyper-focusing on scenes where Alex cried, that I realized I had
created the female I wanted to. 
She was smart, sassy, and both mentally and physically strong.  She was also capable of feeling
compassion, having her heart broken, and falling helplessly in love.  If I edited those parts out I’d be left
with a character who looked like a woman, but acted, spoke, and thought like a
guy.  I didn’t want a dude with
boobs or a pit bull with lipstick; I wanted a woman with guts, brains, and a
heart.  I’m hoping for my sake and
my readers’ that I got it right.

            It’s
a shame that in fantasy, action, and adventure books, guys got all the glory
for so long, and it’s great that female characters (and writers) are fighting
their way to the forefront of these genres, so long as we’re not doing it by
simply slapping heels on our heroes, renaming them heroines, and calling it a
day.  It’s not stereotypical to
admit there are distinct differences between the genders, but it is sexist to
deem certain qualities of either gender as weak.  Most readers will appreciate a writer who’s willing to
embrace and celebrate all sides of a female character.  After all, there’s plenty of room in
most women’s handbags to pack both a Taser and some tissues.  

6 Comments

Filed under Writing